Steinitz named this game. Writing a fortnight after Anderssen's death in 1879, he called the nineteenth move an evergreen in the laurel crown of the departed chess hero, and said the combination behind it had hardly an equal in over-the-board play. A hundred and forty-three years later Daniel King replayed the same score and reached the opposite verdict: he would have declined the sacrifice, taken the queen with a quiet knight move and gone home, and he thinks Black played badly enough to deserve what happened. Both are annotated here at the same moves, so the argument runs alongside the game rather than after it.